Question 23
Question
Can you explain the difference between async/await
and traditional callbacks for handling asynchronous operations?
Answer
Both async/await
and traditional callbacks achieve the goal, but they differ significantly in their syntax and how they feel to work with:
1. Traditional Callbacks:
Syntax: A function is passed as an argument to an asynchronous operation, which is then executed when the operation completes (either successfully or with an error). This can lead to "callback hell" if you have nested operations.
Example:
Pros: Simple for basic operations.
Cons: Can become very difficult to read and manage as the number of asynchronous tasks increases (callback nesting). Error handling can be spread out and less clear.
2. async/await
:
Syntax: Uses
async
keyword before a function declaration to mark it as asynchronous. Inside, useawait
before an awaitable object (like a Promise) to pause execution until the result is available.Example:
Pros: Reads more like synchronous code, easier to understand and debug. Built-in error handling (
try...catch
). More organized and maintainable for complex asynchronous tasks.Cons: Requires a bit more setup (using
async
/await
) compared to callbacks.
In Essence:
Callbacks are older, less readable, prone to "callback hell."
async/await
is a more modern approach, providing cleaner syntax and better error handling for complex asynchronous scenarios.
Last updated